The University of Oregon offers many resources to support you while you study and work in this community. If you need something beyond what's on this list, please reach out to the Office of the Dean of Students and ask!
As of 2021, researchers found that 88% of mobile health (mHealth) apps available for users to download contained code that had the ability to collect user data. The research also revealed that most data collection operations involved third-party providers, and 23% of user data transmissions took place on insecure communication protocols. In addition, only 47% of data transmissions complied with the app’s privacy policies, and 28% of apps did not provide a privacy policy at all. (Source: Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study)
Image Attribution: Created by Chona Kasinger (Free to use under the Disabled and Here project CC-BY)
Privacy has always been a concern, especially in the health domain as the proliferation of mHealth apps has led to a large amount of sensitive data generated. Therefore, it is important for users to perform privacy assessments of mHealth apps by evaluating diverse privacy components; however, it can be difficult as users have different needs of individual care that require different criteria for their assessments. (Source: Privacy Assessment in Mobile Health Apps: Scoping Review)
If people are to use and trust these tools for their mental health, it is crucial for people learn data and informational literacy skills in evaluating the transparency and quality around the data practices of these apps. Especially, as availability of information about developers' data security procedures for mHealth apps, specifically those targeting mental health, has not been thoroughly investigated. (Source: Reviewing the data security and privacy policies of mobile apps for depression)
The purpose of the app evaluation rubric below is to give the user sufficient information from which to make an informed decision that they deem correct for their situation. You can also check out the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Comprehensive App Evaluation Model for in-depth app evaluations.
(was created by)
Lowest Quality (1 pt.) |
Average Quality (2 pt.) |
Best Quality (3 pt.) |
|
---|---|---|---|
Access & Background |
If the app meets MOST of the following criteria:
|
If the app meets MOST of the following criteria:
|
If the app meets MOST of the following criteria:
|
Privacy & Security |
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
Clinical Foundation |
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
Usability |
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
Data Integration towards Therapeutic Goal |
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|
If the app meets ANY of the following criteria:
|